| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:12:47 +0000 From: Cian Brennan <cian.brennan@redbrick.dcu.ie> To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> In-Reply-To: <C487E6DC-4B87-40F0-BE8E-F1308FD34C20@ianai.net> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:02:01PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > > > >> The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they > >> are?" > > > > Because in some organisations, the only vendor that matters is Cisco. > > Then why bother hyping at all? > > Anyone who needs even a significant fraction of 322 Tbps is not going to ignore competitors. > Lots of people who don't will use this as a reason to convince themselves that Cisco is still miles ahead of the competition. After all, $COMPEDITOR isn't hyping their 322 Tbp/s gear. > -- > TTFN, > patrick > > > -- --
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |