[123470] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CRS-3
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Tue Mar 9 15:30:10 2010
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <SNT119-W27EE4020765415CFFC628BDC340@phx.gbl>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:29:56 -0500
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Brandon Kim wrote:
> LOL! Wow that is a pretty sad comment......
>=20
> But back to the CRS-3, just wow!!!
Wow what?
Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping =
_today_?
If you look at some startups, they are doing 4-5 times as many Gbps per =
slot, and pre-release equipment is in use in some networks already.
The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they =
are?"
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
>> Subject: RE: CRS-3
>> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:54:16 -0500
>> From: dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>>=20
>> From: Brian Feeny [mailto:bfeeny@mac.com]=20
>>>=20
>>> So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
>>>=20
>>> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> - Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
>>> - Stream every motion picture ever created in less than four minutes
>>>=20
>>> If nothing else you gotta love the Cisco Marketing machine!
>>>=20
>>> Brian
>>=20
>> The article about this in the tech section on CNN
>> already has comments in it like "Oh, well Cisco
>> owns Linksys and I have a Linksys router so will
>> my ISP be updating me to the CRS-3 so I can
>> download at those speeds?" LOL
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
> =20
