[123447] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Best VPN Appliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason J. W. Williams)
Mon Mar 8 14:57:58 2010
From: "Jason J. W. Williams" <williamsjj@digitar.com>
In-Reply-To: <COL104-DS8E72D5B0AAD0B20B1DDB9F1380@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:57:15 -0700
To: Dawood Iqbal <Dawood_Iqbal@hotmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
We've been running various Fortinet Fortigate appliances since 2003 and =
have had very good luck with them. Clustering is plug-and-play...boxes =
act as a single managed unit and do stateful failover of VPN =
connections. We use the IPsec for site-to-site between our offices and =
our data centers, the SSL VPN we use for all of our road tunnels. SSL =
clients work great on WinXP, Win7 and OS X. There's a new iPhone app as =
well for the web-based VPN.
-J
--------
Jason J. W. Williams, COO/CTO
DigiTar
williamsjj@digitar.com
V: 208.343.8520
F: 208.322.8522
M: 208.863.0727
www.digitar.com
On Mar 5, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Dawood Iqbal wrote:
>=20
> Hello All,
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Is it possible to get your ideas on what VPN appliances are good to =
have in
> enterprise network?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Requirements are;
>=20
> SSL
>=20
> IPSec
>=20
> Client and Web VPN support (Win/MAC/iPhone/Android)
>=20
> If webvpn is used, then when any user connects via webvpn, we should =
be able
> to re-direct him to any and ONLY specific application i.e SAP.
>=20
> If 2 boxes are installed then they should replicate data seamlessly.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> dI
>=20
> !SIG:4b912af4162726244877506!
>=20
