[123313] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IP4 Space

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Fri Mar 5 00:58:28 2010

Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:57:59 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Thomas Magill <tmagill@providecommerce.com>
In-Reply-To: <FA2E47FFA50291418803D2E7C1DF07F30A6A6B87@SDEXCL01.Proflowers.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org



On 03/04/2010 06:41 PM, Thomas Magill wrote:
> I've been on board with rolling out IP6 but the SPs I've talked to are
> all '...about to start trying to possibly think about extending a beta
> to a small portion of some customers' or something along those lines.
> This led me to believe that SPs are way behind on this considering the
> expected exhaustion of IP4 space.

Note, that no operator on this list or any other has had a request
approved but not fulfilled by an RIR due to a lack of numbers to assign.
When that happens if not before you can can expect behavioral change to
occur.

denial
anger
bargaining
depression
acceptance

decide which step you're on...

joel


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post