[123284] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Thu Mar 4 18:30:34 2010
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:30:07 -0600
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
CC: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.1003041526210.28677-100000@citation2.av8.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/4/2010 2:35 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
> When there are 100 million facebook organizations, perhaps your
> comparison will be appropriate. But even then, only if your friends
> participate in all 100 million. Getting the occasional facebook,
> linkedin, and plaxo invitation from your friends is not a DOS. Just
> shows how you like to use inflamatory rhetoric. The strain of the
> rhetoric is what exposes the scam, and your untoward willingness to go
> along with the scammers. (Oh wait, that is the NANOG trademark, isn't
> it?)
Nobody said it would be a DOS.
Some of us who know what we are talking about call it spam, since it
meets every criterion for the term.
I leave the NANOG trademark stuff to those of you who enjoy that.
I took the liberty of stripping all the crosspos.....I mean CC:s off.
--
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to
take everything you have."
Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
