[123265] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IP4 Space

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stan Barber)
Thu Mar 4 16:45:17 2010

From: Stan Barber <sob@academ.com>
In-Reply-To: <3c3e3fca1003041130v7691ea97r48cb48cdd92fe7b0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:44:30 -0600
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:30 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>=20
> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do =
today?
>=20
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin

I would suggest that the ratio of folks that will multihome under IPv6 =
versus those that won't will get smaller. I base that on an assumption =
that NAT (as we know it today) will be less prevalent as IPv6 usage =
grows.=20


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post