[12326] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SpamShield
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tomco.Net Security)
Fri Sep 12 10:57:47 1997
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 10:52:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Tomco.Net Security" <security@apollo.tomco.net>
To: Deepak Jain <deepak@jain.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970910172650.12605A-100000@aries.ai.net>
Finally, someone who is not an smtp nazi. My policy
is as follows:
1) Of my servers a few are designated as MX
hosts. These require a valid FQDN.
This holds someone responsible for the
mail my servers relay.
2) My other servers will only relay mail if
it originates or terminates locally.
Marcus R. Williams, Jr.
security@tomco.net
ISP Programmer / Engineer
On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Deepak Jain wrote:
>
> I didn't see anything about this in the archives, but as far as
> implementing a reasonably friendly anti-spam policy
> (http://www.abest.com/~kai/spamshield.html) without forbidding relaying
> entirely, is there a consensus opinion?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Deepak
>
