[123249] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP4 Space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marco Hogewoning)
Thu Mar 4 14:11:23 2010
From: Marco Hogewoning <marcoh@marcoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <FA2E47FFA50291418803D2E7C1DF07F30A6A671D@SDEXCL01.Proflowers.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 20:10:44 +0100
To: Thomas Magill <tmagill@providecommerce.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> 1. Why don't providers use /31 addresses for P2P links? This
> works fine per rfc 3021 but nobody seems to believe it or use it. Are
> there any major manufacturers out there that do not support it?=20
99.999% of my customers are on /32 anyway. I could probably get a =
handfull of addresses (/25) back by renumbering the backbone links . But =
this will not save the world and they will most likely be used more =
rapidly as I can reclaim them.
MarcoH
