[123156] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Mon Mar 1 15:10:30 2010
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:09:51 -0600
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
CC: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20100301135349.11c8937a@cs.columbia.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/1/2010 12:53 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:04:19 -0600
> Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On 3/1/2010 9:55 AM, Adam Waite wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hm, I was under the impression that ARPANET was a government run
>>>> network...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Not since 1992......what you're looking for these days is NIPRnet
>>> and SIPRnet, and ESnet, etc, etc, etc.
>>>
>>> ARPANET only lives on in reverse dns.....
>>
>> And that is only the TLD label.
>>
>> Is there still a DARPANET, ARPANET's successor?
>>
>>
> Depends on what you mean.
I meant "is there still a DARPAnet" separate and apart from its progeny,
fragments, and follow-ons.
--
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to
take everything you have."
Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
