[123061] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jorge Amodio)
Fri Feb 26 18:19:33 2010
In-Reply-To: <18a5e7cb1002261459p2ef6ac14leb86ab384337c148@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:18:58 -0600
From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com>
To: Bill Stewart <nonobvious@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Maybe I'm dense, but I don't see the problem.
It breaks the existing regional allocation and policy development
process model establishing a second source that will probably not just
want to "allocate" but also develop a parallel policy that will most
probably not be consistent or compatible with the other RIR's.
My .02
