[123042] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Antonio Querubin)
Fri Feb 26 16:14:28 2010

Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:13:47 -1000 (HST)
From: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <E87536A2-6739-42A6-942F-78B826E1DFA7@virtualized.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, David Conrad wrote:

> non-biased way). There are a couple of papers put out by the ITU (or 
> perhaps more accurately, ITU-funded folks) that discuss this.  If anyone 
> cares, I can dig them up.

Some googling for 'itu ipv6' turns up the following (among other things):

http://www.itu.int/net/ITU-T/ipv6/itudocs.aspx

Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp:  tony@lava.net


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post