[1229] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Westnet and Utah outage

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Curtis Villamizar)
Fri Dec 1 23:14:06 1995

To: Jim Forster <forster@cisco.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu, curtis@ans.net, hwb@upeksa.sdsc.edu (Hans-Werner Braun),
        joliveto@cwi.net
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Nov 1995 16:01:35 PST."
             <199512010001.QAA14648@stilton.cisco.com> 
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 1995 23:10:28 -0500
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>


Jim,

> I made a private reply to Curtis on his posting earlier this week, and he
> gave a nice analysis and cc'd end2end-interest rather than nanog.  For
> those that don't care to care to read all this, here's the summary:

[ .. summary deleted .. ]

I did mention that I didn't mind you forwarding that note.

There was subsequent discussion on the end2end-interest list.  I may
be overstating the buffering requirements since the assumption is made
that a high degree of synchronization could occur.  This really needs
to be backed up by simulations.

Curtis

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post