[122899] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Mercer)
Tue Feb 23 01:48:04 2010
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:47:28 -0500
From: Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>
To: NANOG Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <6104c3e31002220808v3fca8a0bp56a58513e9dfbc2c@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:08:54AM -0500, James Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:
> > According to this proposed bill, when a client transfers to a different ISP
> > the email address will optionally be his to take along, "just like" mobile
> > providers do today with phone numbers.
>
> Why does this seem like a really bad idea?
actually, i think its a great idea.
now the ISPs will have an actual interest in shutting down and eliminating
SPAM, as it would make little economic sense to be forwarding huge amounts of
email around when the bulk of it is just gonna be discarded anyways.
( i'm half joking )
--
Jim Mercer jim@reptiles.org +92 336 520-4504
"I'm Prime Minister of Canada, I live here and I'm going to take a leak."
- Lester Pearson in 1967, during a meeting between himself and
President Lyndon Johnson, whose Secret Service detail had taken over
Pearson's cottage retreat. At one point, a Johnson guard asked
Pearson, "Who are you and where are you going?"
