[122887] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Feb 22 21:30:06 2010
To: James Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:35:10 CST."
<6eb799ab1002221735j3cc5b4e7sc3a20ca79e3ecb6c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:29:10 -0500
Cc: NANOG Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1266892150_4018P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:35:10 CST, James Hess said:
> Resolving the destination address is what DNS is for, not what SMTP
> routing is for.
You think the situation is bad now, imagine if the X.400 ADMD= and PRMD=
had caught on. ;)
--==_Exmh_1266892150_4018P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLgz12cC3lWbTT17ARAiViAKDfj7H1IjU2K+2l8atxB0f+14tt+wCgjEcT
MLVA66oV4SN/RVExOWWThAo=
=a/HL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1266892150_4018P--
