[122836] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Mon Feb 22 12:33:25 2010
In-Reply-To: <D89C30C3-E8FB-4234-8D76-2297D566D639@delong.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:59:38 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Am I missing something? All the ISP has to do is to provision a pop3
/ imap / webmail mailbox for that user and keep it around.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> There are huge differences in LNP/WLNP vs. Email Address portability.
>
> Prior to LNP/WLNP, there was already SS7 which is, essentially a centralized
> layer of indirection for phone numbers. This was necessary in order to support
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
