[122825] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mustafa Golam -)
Mon Feb 22 11:45:16 2010
In-Reply-To: <4B82B13D.5010804@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:42:37 +0600
From: Mustafa Golam - <mustafa.golam@gmail.com>
To: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: mustafa.golam@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>wrote:
> On 2/22/2010 10:24 AM, Robert Brockway wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, James Jones wrote:
> >
> >> Why does this seem like a really bad idea?
> >
> > While I think the principal is noble there are operational problems:
>
> I dare say.
>
> I own example. I fire George for a long list of foul deeds. He goes to
> work for another company and writes email from george@example.com that
> injures my reputation.
>
> Not a good plan at all.
>
I think, it will apply only users's email address, not of employee of the
particular ISP.
--Mustafa
