[122799] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Spamhaus

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Sun Feb 21 21:21:03 2010

In-Reply-To: <4B817D93.2030609@opus1.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:50:22 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Joel M Snyder <Joel.Snyder@opus1.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Joel M Snyder <Joel.Snyder@opus1.com> wrote:
> but the false positive count jumped by 112 messages per 10,000 (because
> APEWS was somehow having a lousy month).
>
> In general, the more reputation services you include, the more likely it is
> you're going to have false positives.

Christ.  You pick APEWS as a reputation filter.. and then even bother
to *count* the false positives?

That's not a list that's particularly designed to minimize FPs, to put
it very mildly.

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post