[122683] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spamhaus...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?=)
Fri Feb 19 13:19:19 2010
From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Michelle Sullivan <matthew@sorbs.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:18:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4B7E9B68.8090807@sorbs.net> (Michelle Sullivan's message of
"Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:08:40 +0100")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Michelle Sullivan <matthew@sorbs.net> writes:
> Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:50:59AM -0800, Crist Clark wrote:
>>=20=20=20
>>> And I want to know how they figured out we had a Barracuda.
>>
>> It's not that hard, much of the time -- they tend to make
>> themselves visible via their poor behavior.
>
> Is there some very specific poor behavior you're referring to?
I don't know what Rich referred to, but Barracudas used to be easy to
spot by backscatter levels:
http://www.dontbouncespam.org/#barracuda
Bj=C3=B8rn
