[122675] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Spamhaus...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michelle Sullivan)
Fri Feb 19 09:09:35 2010

Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:08:40 +0100
From: Michelle Sullivan <matthew@sorbs.net>
In-reply-to: <20100219121227.GA13388@gsp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:50:59AM -0800, Crist Clark wrote:
>   
>> And I want to know how they figured out we had a Barracuda.
>>     
>
> It's not that hard, much of the time -- they tend to make
> themselves visible via their poor behavior.
>
>   

Is there some very specific poor behavior you're referring to?


> Finally, this discussion should really be on spam-l, not nanog.
>   

Actually considering the original message was addressed to the 'large
DNS server operators' this is probably more appropriate.  Whether the
non-followups in this thread should be there instead is a different issue.


Michelle


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post