[122652] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Spamhaus...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Levine)
Thu Feb 18 16:59:25 2010

Date: 18 Feb 2010 21:58:55 -0000
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4B7DA21C.1060608@foobar.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

In article <4B7DA21C.1060608@foobar.org> you write:
>On 18/02/2010 10:40, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>> They seem to be doing that a lot of late.  They also contacted my
>> employer and demanded $100k/yr(?) for having a "Use Spamhaus RBL" in our
>> software.  
>
>I sympathise.  It's very frustrating when you try to deal with these
>anti-spam outfits in a reasonable way and you're met with almost completely
>arbitrary b/s.

Spamhaus has a published price list.  If you use them in a separate
filtering service you sell, the price is considerably higher than if
you use them as part of mail service.

R's,
John


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post