[122491] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: dns interceptors
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Feb 15 13:34:33 2010
To: Steven Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:59:56 EST."
<CF29F786-CC86-4AD1-859A-8DBB1940703C@cs.columbia.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:33:05 -0500
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1266258785_4021P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:59:56 EST, Steven Bellovin said:
> Yes -- and as a reward for your expertise, you get to explain the
> problem with a transparent DNS proxy to the judge. For bonus points,
> explain it to a jury....
The transparent DNS proxies aren't the problem. It's the translucent ones
of undetermined opacity that just don't respond to cleaning with Windex that
are the problem...
--==_Exmh_1266258785_4021P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLeZNhcC3lWbTT17ARAqKrAKDsG8te8A6vMduzrGrPhNdpVrW02gCePUvW
EOR+Te3BKy8fKZspSG8lW5I=
=xvpi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1266258785_4021P--
