[122427] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Sun Feb 14 17:36:26 2010
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <201002142217.o1EMHCi8071152@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:35:54 -0500
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jabley@hopcount.ca
Cc: Sean Reifschneider <jafo@tummy.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2010-02-14, at 17:17, Mark Andrews wrote:
> I don't care what internal routing tricks are used, they are still
> under the *one* external route and as such subject to single points
> of failure and as such don't have enough independence.
Are you asserting architectural control over what Level3 decide to do =
with their own servers, Mark? :-)
If their goal is distribute a service for the benefit of their own =
customers, then keeping all anycast nodes associated with that service =
on-net seems entirely sensible.
Joe
