[122396] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BIRD vs Quagga
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arnold Nipper)
Sat Feb 13 18:03:25 2010
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:02:53 +0100
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold@nipper.de>
To: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
In-Reply-To: <5CC5BD71-7131-4703-9164-564017FD3616@daork.net>
Cc: nanOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig558C30D8D4F58661D84D8E5E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 13.02.2010 02:01 Nathan Ward wrote
> On 13/02/2010, at 11:51 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>=20
>> fwiw, I've also heard good things about bgpd(8) and ospfd(8), but I
>> haven't tried those either...zebra/Quagga just stuck.
>=20
>=20
> OpenBGPd would be great for a public route server at an IX.
>=20
Be cautious when doing filtering. bgpctl will hang for minutes, even
hours. Otherwise OpenBGPD seems to be very performant.
Quagga does not really behave well with lots of peers (lots >> 200), but
there will be an optimized route server version soon.
BIRD seems to do fine.
Best regards,
Arnold
--=20
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold@nipper.de phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 172 2650958 fax: +49 6224 9259 333
--------------enig558C30D8D4F58661D84D8E5E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFLdy+erz6CwpRB/EwRAnn3AJsEC/DQ9F+lCpr+B+aXJnlD312S6QCeLea4
BxDJYn3hQN2IT5hERzdwrpw=
=zlVB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig558C30D8D4F58661D84D8E5E--
