[122383] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Fri Feb 12 20:10:10 2010
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B75FA48.7070509@rollernet.us>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:09:40 +1300
To: nanOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 13/02/2010, at 2:03 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 2/12/2010 15:03, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>>=20
>> What time frame do you determine to be instability? The following is
>> from a box that has ~25 neighbours. Since the box was reloaded (6w3d
>> ago), I've had the same uptime with the Team Cymru neighbours as I do
>> with internal gear. I can't say that I've experienced any instability =
at
>> all. It is not uncommon for me to have noticed uptimes well beyond =
30w.
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> Mine are not so good:
>=20
> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
> State/PfxRcd
> 38.229.0.5 4 65333 115856 115859 16411814 0 0 01:33:51 =
30
>=20
> 68.22.187.24 4 65333 26968 29671 16311293 0 0 2w4d
> 30
>=20
> I see you have 68.22.187.24 in your list too, but my uptime is less. =
Are
> you using increased hold times?
Nevermind BGP timers, do you normally do well holding TCP connections =
open for weeks on end across the Internet?
--
Nathan Ward=
