[122366] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Fri Feb 12 17:09:38 2010
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:09:58 -0800
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4B75CC7E.4010908@cymru.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/12/2010 13:47, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On 2/12/2010 4:21 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
>> I've a question for the CYMRU Team , My reasoning for posting here
>> is to get a much wide knowledge base .
>
>> Does or Is the 'Bogon Peering' Product(?) , Only at the IANA->RIR
>> allocations level ? F.E.: IANA has allocated 1.0.0.0/8 to RIPE .
>
>> Or
>
>> Does the product also include the actual remaining non-allocated
>> space at the RIR->EU level ? (**) F.E: RIPE has allocated 1.0.1.0/24
>> to anubusstupidity, inc.
>
> Jim & All,
>
> The current bogon reference projects we have available only include the
> first of your examples - netblocks which have not been allocated by IANA
> to an RIR. However, we are currently in a beta testing phase of a
> similar feed which also includes netblocks that have not yet been
> allocated or assigned by the RIRs. We will also be offering the same
> type of bogon feed for IPv6, something we've been asked about quite a
> bit recently!
>
While I have your attention, I've noticed there's been a bit of
instability lately with the BGP sessions (in fact one of mine right now
is down). With 30 routes it's not a big deal to have frequent churn, but
if you're going to expand that to a larger feed then it could become a
problem.
~Seth
