[122358] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Carrozzo)
Fri Feb 12 16:14:32 2010
In-Reply-To: <4B75C3C6.508@ibctech.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:14:04 -0500
From: Jack Carrozzo <jack@crepinc.com>
To: Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I agree - quick setup and no issues. A++ Would Peer Again
-Jack Carrozzo
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca> wrote:
> Thomas Magill wrote:
>> In efforts to further protect us against threats I am considering
>> establishing Bogon peers to enable me to filter unallocated address
>> space. =A0I am just wondering if this is a worthwhile step to take and i=
f
>> anyone has ran into any issues or points of concern that I may want to
>> take into account. =A0Thanks in advance for any input.
>
> I've used the service for a couple of years, and I find it works
> wonderfully. Newly distributed IANA blocks are removed promptly, so no
> need to worry about that.
>
> I peer with Cymru on my RTBH trigger boxes, which then redistribute the
> list to all edge gear which blackholes it (dest and source) thanks to uRP=
F.
>
> No manual config or rule manipulation.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
