[122310] in North American Network Operators' Group
Policy feedback - was Re: Denic (.de) blocking 6to4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Edward Lewis)
Thu Feb 11 08:51:52 2010
In-Reply-To: <a05493651002110426u7d9688c9i273ff64c456ecdc7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:43:36 -0500
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Cc: ed.lewis@neustar.biz
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
At 13:26 +0100 2/11/10, Igor Ybema wrote:
>Ok, policy is policy and we should not complain.
No, really, policies should be examined and questioned.
Having been in policy meetings, unless the operations crowd openly
questions and gives feed back, the meetings are just wastes of time.
>However, I'm asking your opinions about this policy.
That's the right first step.
(Note: no commentary on 6to4 in this, I'm not familiar enough with it.)
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468
As with IPv6, the problem with the deployment of frictionless surfaces is
that they're not getting traction.
