[122161] in North American Network Operators' Group
=?utf-8?Q?Re:_Adopt=E2=80=90an=E2=80=90Haitian=E2=80=90Internet?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Mon Feb 8 14:23:22 2010
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B706160.7020700@nic-naa.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:22:42 -0800
To: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>> Err, no. It was introduced by (unsigned) email purporting to come =
from Eric. Followed by another (unsigned) message with bank info =
purporting to come from Reynold Guerrier. A bit of a difference.
> True. Signed would have been smarter. Better still would be having =
someone with more creds doing the initial ask.
In my mind, it isn't the credibility of the person doing the asking, =
rather it's the fact that (unsigned) email can't really be trusted =
(although most, if not all, of us do it all the time).
Regards,
-drc
