[122141] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How polluted is 1/8?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Petri Helenius)
Sun Feb 7 05:35:30 2010
From: Petri Helenius <petri@helenius.fi>
In-Reply-To: <008197CB-E5F4-4EAA-8D5D-53401F0DD26C@puck.nether.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 12:34:56 +0200
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi,
We would also be happy to sink the traffic and provide captures and =
statistics for general consumption.
Pete
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>=20
> On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
>=20
>> Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some =
measurements to find out how "polluted" this block really is.
>>> See some surprising results on RIPE Labs: =
http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18
>>> Please also note the call for feedback at the bottom of the article.
>>=20
>> The most surprising thing in that report was that someone has an =
AMS-IX
>> port at just 10 megs. It would be nice to see an actual measurement =
of
>> the traffic and daily/weekly changes. A breakdown of the flow data by
>> source ASN and source prefix (for the top 50-100 sources) would also =
be
>> interesting.
>=20
> There was a call on the apnic list for someone to sink some of the =
traffic.
>=20
> I'd like to see someone capture the data and post pcaps/netflow =
analysis, and possibly just run a http server on that /24 so people can =
test if their network is broken.
>=20
> I've taken a peek at the traffic, and I don't think it's 100's of =
megs, but without a global view who knows.
>=20
> - Jared
>=20
