[122132] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC,

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (isabel dias)
Sat Feb 6 16:08:00 2010

Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 13:07:29 -0800 (PST)
From: isabel dias <isabeldias1@yahoo.com>
To: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com>,
	Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100206161501.15d23075@opy.nosense.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Big Brother is watching you! so last year!

True, but the lawfull intercept has been around for a while, active/passive flow tap monitoring, port mirroring , called ID spoofing .......i also saw an update on the IOS/Junos roadmpap not that long ago. the 7600 has been around for a while now and so the code that comes w/ that feature available .........

lets not generate more data traffic than this .......as in case of infringement all data is recorded, stored, used as evidence and brought to our attention by the home "team", so we know in advance .....:-)


snmp v3 has been around for a gd while .......


--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org> wrote:

> From: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
> Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and  recommendations
> To: "Jorge Amodio" <jmamodio@gmail.com>
> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 6:45 AM
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:47:47 -0600
> Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > I'm totally ignorant (most of the time), is anybody
> actually using SNMPv3 ?
> > 
> 
> I worked with an IPsec VPN product around 10 years ago that
> used SNMPv3
> for automated provisioning of the tunnels.
> 
> > Regards
> > 
> 
> 


      


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post