|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:28:58 -0500 (EST) From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org> To: Dustin Jurman <dustin@rseng.net> In-Reply-To: <6B01C29BEA65E347A560D0306A33D63BDF309131A4@RSSBS08.rseng.net> Cc: "'nanog@nanog.org'" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Dustin Jurman wrote: > I know this is an emotional issue for some but we're looking at some > upgrades to our cores and being a classic cisco shop we're wondering if > anyone has had any experience with the Cisco ASR models in the service > provider space. We're used to running VXR's and are trying to make a > decision between going with G2 proc or moving into the ASR's. These > would be edge routers. Any input would be appreciated. Thank you. Wouldn't it be better to start a new thread for this, rather trying to hijack an unrelated thread? VXRs and ASRs have nothing to do with fiber plant management. jms > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:martin@theicelandguy.com] > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:02 PM > To: Justin M. Streiner > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: fiber plant management? > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Justin M. Streiner > <streiner@cluebyfour.org>wrote: > >> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Martin Hannigan wrote: >> >> Honestly? A spreadsheet will do it. >>> >> >> Our fiber plant is large enough, and enough people make changes that a >> spreadsheet is not a scalable option. >> >> > > > How large? > > > > -- > Martin Hannigan martin@theicelandguy.com > p: +16178216079 > Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and Occupants > > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |