[122100] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Ewing)
Fri Feb 5 13:16:51 2010
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:16:27 -0600
From: Brandon Ewing <nicotine@warningg.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1002051240260.22634@rarevos-pinsdev.pins.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:45:13PM -0500, David Birnbaum wrote:
> We have noticed a lot of issues with Asterisk 1.2 and some 1.4 rollouts.=
=20
> FreePBX had some truck-sized holes in it.
>
FreePBX 2.6.0 defaults to refusing anonymous SIP calls. If you enable
inbound anonymous calls, it includes only the "from-trunk" context, making
it behave like a standard incoming over over a configured trunk. If you've
configured FreePBX to allow outgoing calls from the trunk context, you have
larger problems in general.
--=20
Brandon Ewing (nicotine@warningg.com)
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFLbGB77UrjtO3ToYoRAvJNAJ9rw5ijbvefxKkNXWJx04NAkUXAawCeLpgu
SZ++YEB/bS7DZ5mH8eytG4o=
=8nix
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--
