[121954] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Fiber Cut in CA?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Simmons)
Tue Feb 2 15:30:05 2010

In-Reply-To: <18a5e7cb1002021227w7b96b411tbf029ac91a75e51f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:29:39 -0500
From: Matt Simmons <standalone.sysadmin@gmail.com>
To: Bill Stewart <nonobvious@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

And in an open desert, back hoes can smell fiber from miles away.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Bill Stewart <nonobvious@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:04 AM, =C2=A0<charles@knownelement.com> wrote:
>> That is one long protect path. Yikes.
>
> There be mountains in the way, with deserts in between, and not a lot
> of people to justify diversity or railroads and highways to run it
> along.
> Not many carriers have more than one fiber route across Arizona and
> New Mexico, especially for the newer high-capacity fibers (i.e. built
> this millennium, after the financial excesses of the 90s.)
> I'm no longer current on what routes are being used by what carriers,
> but if you don't have two routes across northern Arizona ( I-10/I-40,
> with restoration routes like Barstow->LasVegas->Flagstaff->Phoenix),
> then the next alternative is Barstow->LasVegas->SaltLakeCity->Denver,
> at which point some carriers have routes down to Phoenix via Tucumcari
> or Amarillo, and the rest are going to go through Dallas, and anybody
> who doesn't have the LasVegas->SLC route is going to use
> Sacramento->SLC->Denver, possibly also including San Jose, depending
> on what routes they've got across California.
>
> So, yeah, instead of the nice short 2200-mile restoration routes you
> can use if SF->Seattle fails, cable cuts in the Southwest can be
> really long...
> --
> ----
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Thanks; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Bill
>
> Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still experimental s=
o far.
> And Google probably logs and indexes everything you send it.
>
>



--=20

LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST?
COOKIE MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post