[121906] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Default route with object tracking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Feb 1 11:27:00 2010
In-Reply-To: <4B66F77B.8010603@xyonet.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:26:23 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Curtis Maurand <cmaurand@xyonet.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Curtis Maurand <cmaurand@xyonet.com> wrote=
:
>
> I'd rather send him to something more open like kernel.org; =A0anything b=
ut
> Google's DNS. =A0Google's DNS is a little too nefarious for my taste.
<tinfoil hat off>
nefarious? as a route object to track for selection of a default route? rea=
lly?
</tinfoil hat off>
I think watching something 'very stable' like.... 198.6.0.0/16 may be
useful, but in the end "pick some route that's long lived and not in
just your upstream's control', that you see via both upstreams." seems
like the best option.
-chris
