[121839] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Thu Jan 28 09:07:32 2010
From: "TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com>
To: "'NANOG'" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <30B87542-95CC-4737-AA5C-AE4DA55B7906@eyeconomics.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:07:11 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tvest@eyeconomics.com [mailto:tvest@eyeconomics.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 08:12
> To: Richard Barnes
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
<SNIP>
> But then that begs the question of why lots of other very large retail
> Internet access providers have not indicated that they're committed to the
> same course of action (?).
> They're certainly not the only provider that employs a public IP address-
> intensive access model, so where are the other retail IPv6 trial
> announcements/pre-announcements?
Other providers are moving in that direction, atleast a couple are (as a
swag) 6-18 months behind Comcast ...
/TJ
