[121800] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Wed Jan 27 12:52:23 2010
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:52:02 -0600
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <74C0E810-5808-4FF1-AFA6-329C35BC896E@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/27/2010 5:09 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>>> The general intent of the /48 allocation is that it is large enough for
>>> nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the largest
>>> of organisations.
>>
>> the general intent of a class B allocation is that it is large enough
>> for nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the
>> largest of organisations.
>>
>> hmmmmm
>>
>> randy
>
> That would, indeed, work if we weren't short of class B networks
> to assign.
>
> Owen
ITYM --- That would, indeed, work if we weren't so short sighted in our
view of how the demand economics term) would expand to exceed the supply.
[For the record I do not see any way of foreseeing the unforeseen (and
unforeseeable). I ask only that the latest whizbang be marketed as the
latest whizbang (which is likely to be be pretty impressive--it always
has been), not the answer for all of time.)
--
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to
take everything you have."
Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
