[121789] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Wed Jan 27 06:10:59 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2tyu7sui1.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:09:11 -0800
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> The general intent of the /48 allocation is that it is large enough for
>> nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the largest
>> of organisations.
>
> the general intent of a class B allocation is that it is large enough
> for nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the
> largest of organisations.
>
> hmmmmm
>
> randy
That would, indeed, work if we weren't short of class B networks
to assign.
Owen
