[121759] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Tue Jan 26 12:09:06 2010
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:08:51 -0800
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <9e246b4d1001260743r4b7caca8h40e50c58a9bce429@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/26/10 7:43 AM, Tim Durack wrote:
>> o will your remote-office's ISP's accept the /48's per site? (vz/vzb
>> > is a standout example here)
> Not too worried about VZ. Given that large content providers are
> getting end-site address space, I think they will have to adjust their
> stance.
>
However, they are claiming their own size (i.e. we're bigger) as one
reason not to allow anything smaller than a /32.
~Seth
