[121749] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Senie)
Tue Jan 26 10:05:57 2010
From: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B5F0243.2040605@ttec.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:05:29 -0500
To: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
> For me, the entire debate boils down to this question.
>=20
> What should the objective be, decades or centuries?
If centuries, how many planets and moons will the address space cover? =
(If we as a species manages to spread beyond this world before we =
destroy it). Will separate /3's, or subdivisions of subsequent /3's, be =
the best approach to deploying a large-scale IPv6 network on Mars? (and =
yes, a bit of work would be required to make the round-trip times fall =
within TCP's windows).=
