[121729] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Jan 25 22:38:38 2010
In-Reply-To: <DBE3E7B5-5A72-45E5-B879-E90240D0826E@delong.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:38:16 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> Once you start planning a practical address plan, IPv6 isn't as big as
>> everybody keeps saying...
>
> It's more than big enough for any deployment I've seen so far with plenty
> of room to spare.
Oh good! so the us-DoD's /10 request is getting filled when?
-Chris
