[121550] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: fix the edge (was Re: 1/8 and 27/8 allocated to APNIC)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Fri Jan 22 00:03:17 2010
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:02:37 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Anton Kapela <tkapela@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e9d8ae51001211751x3fd56384te2322be25a83d99c@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Durand, Alain" <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Anton Kapela wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> wrote:
>
>> I thought there was some other group that had been squatting in 1/8,
>> something about radio and peer to peer...but not AnoNet (at least that name
>> was totally unfamiliar)...but this was all I could find with a quick google.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AnoNet#Scaling
>
> oh, the irony. good thing privacy costs too much for the majority of
> internet users.
>
> on a serious note, who cares? Resolution to the 1/8 allocation "mess"
> seems on par with freeing up IP stacks from excluding 240/4, but by
> the time any of this is resolved, perhaps residential users on att
> dsl/etc might just have working IP6CP, or will have switched to
> comcast by then.
It's way lower than 240/4 one doesn't have to patch the kernel on a
billion devices.
> -Tk
>
