|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:22:57 -0500 (EST) From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> To: George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com> In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE081F7352@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com> Cc: "Durand, Alain" <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>, nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, George Bonser wrote: > Some of that water is dirtier than the rest. I wouldn't want to be the > person who gets 1.2.3.0/24 The whole /8 should be fun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AnoNet To avoid addressing conflict with the internet itself, the range 1.0.0.0/8 is used. This is to avoid conflicting with internal networks such as 10/8, 172.16/12 and 192.168/16, as well as assigned Internet ranges. In the event that 1.0.0.0/8 is assigned by IANA, anoNet could move to the next unassigned /8, though such an event is unlikely, as 1.0.0.0/8 has been reserved since September 1981. I thought there was some other group that had been squatting in 1/8, something about radio and peer to peer...but not AnoNet (at least that name was totally unfamiliar)...but this was all I could find with a quick google. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |