home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> In-Reply-To: <00af01ca941e$ba3c6390$2eb52ab0$@net> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:14:12 -0500 To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote: > I for one would be really happy to see them follow through with this. = I was > very disappointed when they agreed to censor search results, although = I can > understand why they did so from a business standpoint... it seemed to = go > against the google mantra of "do no evil"... >=20 > I'm skeptical if they'll go through with it... According to their spokesperson, they have already stopped censoring. That sounds a bit iffy to me. It's one thing to say "we want to stop = censoring, and will pull out if you don't let us", and "we are breaking = the law, nah, nah, nah". You don't like the law, don't do biz in that country. But blatantly = breaking a law is bad joo-joo. --=20 TTFN, patrick >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ken Chase [mailto:math@sizone.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 12:24 AM >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: more news from Google >>=20 >> I must say I'll have to take a step back from my previous >> position/postings >> having read this article. >>=20 >> I just can't figure out their /ANGLE/. :) </cynic> >>=20 >> http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html >>=20 >> Well played, google? >>=20 >> /kc >> -- >> Ken Chase - ken@heavycomputing.ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA >> Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS >> @151 Front St. W. >=20 >=20
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |