[120538] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IGMP and PIM protection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Glen Kent)
Wed Dec 23 19:13:30 2009
In-Reply-To: <2e9d8ae50912231432g4cc42cfbt9a764206eea0d03@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:42:37 +0530
From: Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com>
To: Anton Kapela <tkapela@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>
> Musing on the idea for a moment, it would surely be 'nice' to somehow
> know that PIM v2 joins from some other network were, in fact, 'good'
> or somehow well-formed, rate-limited, and/or somehow 'safe' to accept
> & hold state for. However, it seems as if the OP isn't interested in
> inter-domain "rp protection" -- and probably more interested in
> authenticating more local igmp v2/3 joins for STB's and the like.
Yup, i was currently looking at the IGMP v2/v3 joins only.
Kent
>
> Glen, clarify?
>
> -Tk
>
