[120516] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IGMP and PIM protection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Glen Kent)
Wed Dec 23 09:18:56 2009
In-Reply-To: <4B320C6E.5040105@poggs.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:47:24 +0530
From: Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com>
To: Peter Hicks <peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>>
>
> Would encrypting multicast not fundamentally break the concept of multicast
> itself, unless you're encrypting multicast traffic over a backbone?
>
No, i wasnt alluding to encrypting the multicast traffic. I was
thinking of using ESP-NULL (AH is optional) for the IGMP/PIM packets.
Affably,
Kent
