[120497] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Tue Dec 22 22:10:09 2009
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:07:46 -0800
In-Reply-To: <5b602b520912221854u7889e1dm3c3c7f91976acffe@mail.gmail.com>
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com>
To: "eric clark" <cabenth@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eric clark
> I'm not an expert, but can/should you advertise ARIN IP space on APNIC
> or RIPE, etc ? You are talking about having recieved ip space from
> ARIN, tied to an ARIN AS.... I suppose it's probably more a matter of
> form than anything else though.....
That is what prompted me to say that I could probably justify a /48 in
each region out of that region's registry. We have legitimate business
operations in those regions so having an AS and IP block for those
regions should not only be justifiable but also would tend to make
things "cleaner".
