[120413] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Routing to multiple uplinks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Dec 18 20:11:19 2009
To: rodrick brown <rodrick.brown@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:46:42 EST."
<D774B787-4A89-4104-BF85-6750D73D1457@gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:10:15 -0500
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1261185015_3855P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:46:42 EST, rodrick brown said:
> The applicatiOn running on these hosts must only see/use one target
> address this needs to be transparent as possible. NIC bonding/teaming
> on the host side isn't a viable solution because of the latency
> overhead same goes for vrrp/hsrp.
If you're worried about the latency issues with NIC bonding, what do you
intend to do about the speed-of-light latency from Chicago to NYC?
--==_Exmh_1261185015_3855P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLLCf3cC3lWbTT17ARAk7MAJ4jGvh3TFtRtVRfchtcDcGdzWQ8zwCgi9ot
G270hN8u+3fzrC4NqlmZcmI=
=SJbO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1261185015_3855P--
