[120403] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Chinese bgp metering story
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jorge Amodio)
Fri Dec 18 16:02:46 2009
In-Reply-To: <CFD4B414-8532-41FB-876D-1291D9DE24D6@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:01:54 -0600
From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>
>> And don't be so hard on the ITU folks, the only thing they want to break
>> is the monopoly of IP address allocation.
>
> With all due respect, they don't want to break said monopoly, assuming one
> agrees that it is a monopoly (I think there's a lot more to the story than
> that, but that's another discussion). They want to *be* said monopoly.
Indeed !!! I was being sarcastic, I was watching live the last IGF
meeting when by proxy ICANN's CEO got grilled with the question about
IPv6 address allocation.
Jorge
