[120380] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Chinese bgp metering story
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Bellovin)
Fri Dec 18 13:34:59 2009
From: Steven Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.61.0912181022310.5226@paixhost.pch.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:32:02 -0500
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Joly MacFie wrote:
>> I have posted sa comment on this from ISOC England on
>> http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=3D134
>> Please feel free to add comments there.
>=20
> If anyone has questions about this, the "invited experts" who managed =
to=20
> wedge their feet in the door at the Kampala meeting were myself, =
Nishal=20
> Goburdhan (AfriNIC), and Michuki Mwangi (ISOC). Any of us would be =
happy=20
> to discuss it. We were there by the grace of the U.S. delegation, =
which=20
> fights the good fight on the Internet's behalf in intergovernmental=20
> negotiations like this.
Could you post a summary, in appropriate technical terms, of precisely =
what is being requested, and what changes to BGP they want?
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
