[120307] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Armstrong)
Wed Dec 16 00:31:29 2009
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:30:55 +0000
From: Adam Armstrong <lists@memetic.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0912091506270.30843@scott.cb3rob.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 09/12/2009 15:18, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
>> a84-22-xx-xx.cb3rob.net. as it's RFC complient and we cannot be fucked to
>>
haha. and what precisely did you expect? that's not really what most
people would consider valid reverse dns for a mail relay. (operational
practice often beats RFC where they exist, and more often than not fills
in where they don't).
personally, i'd recommend not being a dick and setting valid
*meaningful* reverse dns for things relaying mail.
(i also notice that in later replies you claim that they're breaking eu
data laws, but you seem to have bleeted on enough about how you think
data is something that should be in the public domain, so you can
download movies, err i mean, be like totally free man.)
adama.
